Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Solar Pro4 from Upstage on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
GLM 5.2
Solar Pro4GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
Solar Pro4: $0.3/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $2.524/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
GLM 5.2: 1509; Solar Pro4: 1447 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Solar Pro4 accepts 524,288 input tokens.
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Solar Pro4 accepts text input and supports long context.
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Related model match-ups readers also look at.