GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0
Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 from InclusionAI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
GLM 5.2
inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0Ling-mini-2.0 is a small-sized, high-performance large language model based on the MoE architecture. It has a total of 16 billion parameters, but only activates 1.4 billion parameters per token (non-embedding 789 million), achieving extremely high generation speed. Thanks to the efficient MoE design and large-scale high-quality training data, despite activating only 1.4 billion parameters, Ling-mini-2.0 still demonstrates top-tier performance on downstream tasks comparable to dense LLMs under 10 billion parameters and even larger-scale MoE models.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0?
inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0: $0.272/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $2.524/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Which responds faster?
inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0: 0.5s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
Which one generates tokens faster?
GLM 5.2 at 35.9 tok/s and inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 at 8.7 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.